Architecture
as Signs and Systems for a Management Time by Venturi Scott Brown is a thought-provoking
reading about two major roles of architecture and design.
1. "Architecture as
Signs and Systems" revisits the elemental quality of architecture as
‘symbol’ and ‘shelter’ in the context of our information age. There are various
patterns that urban design planners need to understand in order to plan. These
patterns can be seen as activities of people in cities and buildings indicate
patterns and have been developed by economists and regional scientists to
explain the shapes of urban settlement.
2. The two major roles of
architecture, as defined by Venturi Scott Brown are: architecture as shelter
and architecture as signage. Signage doesn’t only mean advertising, but has to
do with communication, decoration, information and symbolism. Put them all
together and you have a “decorated shed,” a phrase which they coined.
3. In any city, density is conditioned by
geometry. When people want to be at the centre, they face the issue of less
area than at the edges. This is shown in various diagrammatic examples in the
article. This includes maps that have traced a pattern of towns set
concentrically around a regional market centre – ‘a central place’. Venturi
Scott Brown believes that this causes hysteria at the centre and anemia at the
periphery.
4. By taking an
analytic cross cuts through a city enables people to isolate one variable for
study; in the case of this article, a system of signs. Each exists within a
pattern of streets. Examining the city as a series of patterns formed by a
series of interrelated subsystems enables the clarification of patterns and the
detection of new ones.
5. By superimposing selected cross-cuts, the
process of analysis moves on to synthesis. An illustration in the article of
the Las Vegas
strip shows that by documenting signs on the strip leads to an understanding of
the strip as a series of overlaid patterns evolving from the economic, social,
natural and physical systems.
6. From understanding
the systems, the next step is using this to plan a design. The plan for the University of Pennsylvania and the Perelman Quadrangle
was used to explain this process. By using systems, the planners were able to
define nodes and conjunctions of activity on campus, the movements of students
between classes, the distribution of classrooms and how accessible they are to
the students, locations of all entrances and possible entrances, and the
different activity areas and public spaces.
7. The idea of ‘the
street through the building’ is pathways that create circulation through the building.
An example of this is the First Campus Centre at Princeton University .
The ‘streets’ through this building have been designed to emulate narrow,
medieval laneways which are lined with stores, and which lead to a large common
area at the back where various activities take place.
8. A closer look at overlaying patterns can
be seen in the example of the University
of Michigan Master Plan
and Life Sciences Complex. There are many things to be learnt by taking a
series of analytic cross cuts through the data, then combining this with other
variables. By juxtaposing classrooms, studios and labs with commercial uses
illustrates the relationship between them is illustrated.
9. The planning analysis of patterns are
not only concerned with urban economic and transportation systems, but also with
environmental factors that influence the planning of buildings. This is evident
in the map of the UM North Campus which analyses the environmental framework
system that should influence the planning and design.
10. The article proposes using new communication and engineering
technologies to initiate an evolved architectural language – one through which
buildings can react to shifting paradigms in a contemporary ‘context’ to better
perform their function of wider geographical and intellectual territory.
No comments:
Post a Comment